Accessibility Tools

Web Accessibility plugin by DJ-Extensions.com

On the Ground

Explore our work with partners, globally and locally, to tackle social and economic injustice using a human rights lens.

UN Committee Reiterates Concerns about the UK’s Financial Support to Private For-Profit, Low-Cost Private Education Project

UN Committee Reiterates Concerns about the UK’s Financial Support to Private For-Profit, Low-Cost Private Education Project

The UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights has again raised significant concerns regarding the United Kingdom's approach to international development assistance, particularly highlighting its support for private, for-profit education initiatives.

In its recent concluding observations released in March 2025, the Committee underscored the urgent need for robust mechanisms to assess and mitigate the human rights impacts of the UK's overseas aid projects. Together with our partners, the Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights submitted evidence to CESCR, highlighting how UK aid continues to support commercial private schools despite clear warnings and serious concerns raised by reports from the UK Parliament and international investigations.

Camila Barretto Maia, our Acting Executive Director, welcomed the Committee’s concluding observations, stating: 'We welcome CESCR’s Concluding Observations which reaffirm a crucial principle: public funds must be directed towards strengthening free, quality public services, including education, which is essential to upholding human rights for all. We equally welcome the Committee’s groundbreaking recommendation on the importance of establishing public registries of assets to combat illicit flows and tax evasion, which enormously impact the ability of other States to mobilize resources for economic, social and cultural rights.’

 

Here's the press release:

 

9 Years After, UN Human Rights Committee Reiterates Its Concerns about the UK’s Financial Support to Private For-Profit, Low-Cost Private Education Project

 

This March 2025, the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights released its concluding observations regarding the UK’s implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. They include specific recommendations regarding both the UK’s official development assistance (ODA) in the field of education and  tax policies which hinder the ability of States to mobilize the maximum available resources for the implementation of Covenant rights, including the right to education. 

The Committee expresses concerns about ‘the lack of effective mechanisms to assess the impact of operations funded by development assistance institutions on the enjoyment of Covenant rights. In this regard, the Committee is particularly concerned about funding provided by British International Investments for private, for-profit (...) low-cost private education projects, which have attracted strong criticism for their negative impact on Covenant rights in recipient countries.’ 

The Committee urges the UK to:

  • Strengthen the measures designed to analyse the impact that operations funded by development assistance institutions have on the enjoyment of Covenant rights in recipient countries, in particular the rights (...)[such as] education prior to their decisions;
  • Establish a regular monitoring mechanism to assess the human rights impact of policies and projects in recipient countries and take preventive or corrective actions where necessary;
  • Ensure that its official development assistance programmes prioritise supporting recipient countries in meeting their obligations under the Covenant, especially in guaranteeing everyone access to free, quality, primary and secondary education and high quality (...).

The Committee also recommends the UK to:

  • Strengthen efforts to combat illicit financial flows, tax evasion, and fraud, particularly by wealthy individuals and businesses, by establishing public registries of companies and trusts with mandatory due diligence, thereby supporting international initiatives to that effect and helping other States mobilize resources for realizing economic, social, and cultural rights;
  • Prevent and punish the use of shell companies for profit-shifting, tax evasion and fraud by strengthening its legal framework and reinforcing whistle-blowers protection measures;
  • Conduct an independent, participatory impact assessment of the extra-territorial effects of its financial secrecy and corporate tax policies on the economies of developing countries. 

The publication of these concluding observations closes a review process started in May 2022 with the submission of a report by the UK describing how they have been implementing economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to education. In January 2023, our organisations* at global and national level submitted an alternative report to the UN Committee sharing our concerns and evidence about the UK’s financial support to for-profit / commercial private schools through its official development aid and about its corporate tax policies and its impacts on the right to education. The UN Committee took it into consideration and, in March 2023, when issuing a list of questions to the UK government asking for more information, included one specifically related to the UK international development cooperation in the area of education**. The UK did not respond to this question in its second report submitted to the Committee in October 2024. We therefore submitted a second report in  November 2024, providing updated information, including:

  • The major concerns raised by the International Development Committee of the UK Parliament about the UK’s investments as part of Overseas Development Aid
  • The UK’s non-response following findings from investigations by the International Finance Corporation (IFC)’s Compliance Advisor Ombudsman (CAO)
  • Detailed update on the UK’s investments in fee-charging private education

In 2016, the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights had already concluded that the UK’s financial support to low-cost private education in developing countries was in contravention of human rights.

Delphine Dorsi, Director at the Right to Education Initiative stated: ‘This is a major victory for all actors mobilising across the world to protect the right to education for all. It shows the consistency of UN experts regarding the serious threat of the privatisation of education and the need to address this issue from a human rights perspective. It is also a great example of the usefulness of UN human rights mechanisms to advance the realisation of the right to education.’

Kitty Arie, CEO at Results UK stressed: ‘The Committee's excellent report underlines the need for the UK Government to increase funding for effective education programmes that support human rights, and that means publishing a route back to spending 0.7% of our Gross National Income on Official Development Assistance as soon as possible. It also shows clearly why the UK must move towards more equitable funding for education and all the Sustainable Development Goals, including closing the tax loopholes that deprive Global South countries of fiscal space to do so - an area where the UK has an outsized global role’.

Anderson Miamen, National Coordinator at Coalition for Transparency and Accountability in Education, reacted from Liberia: ‘These recommendations are highly welcomed. Evidence has shown the detrimental impact on the right to education in Liberia by for-profit companies receiving UK aid. It shows the gaps in due diligence and oversight in development financing, which UK and other governments must urgently address to ensure that their support positively impacts the rights holders. We call for greater transparency and due diligence for the UK Government in its development assistance.’

Joanne O’Neill, Head of Advocacy, ActionAid UK, emphasised ‘We welcome the Committee's recommendation for the UK government to support initiatives against illicit financial flows and tax abuse. However, as one of the biggest facilitators of the nearly $492 billion lost to global tax abuse each year, the UK must do more than acknowledge the problem—it must take action. Instead of blocking progress on a UN Tax Convention, the UK should support this vital process, which could unlock crucial resources for education, healthcare, and other public services that are vital in fulfilling the rights of women, men and children worldwide. This could not be more urgent, particularly in light of the recent cuts to the UK’s ODA budget."

Camila Barretto Maia, Acting Executive Director at the Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (GI-ESCR), stated: ‘We welcome CESCR’s Concluding Observations which reaffirm a crucial principle: public funds must be directed towards strengthening free, quality public services, including  education, which is essential to upholding human rights for all. We equally welcome the Committee’s groundbreaking recommendation on the importance of establishing public registries of assets to combat illicit flows and tax evasion, which enormously impact the ability of other States to mobilize resources for economic, social and cultural rights.’

We will now monitor the impact and implementation of these concluding observations at national level and will engage with the UK’s government as part of this process. 

 

CONTACTS


●    Delphine Dorsi, Right to Education Initiative: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. 
●    Joanne O’Neill, Head of Advocacy, ActionAid UK: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. 

 

*ActionAid, Coalition for Transparency and Accountability in Education (Liberia), East African Centre for Human Rights (EACHRights, Kenya), Eurodad, Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Global Justice Now, Initiative for Economic and Social Rights (ISER, Uganda), Oxfam GB, RESULTS UK, Right to Education Initiative, World Organization for Early Childhood Education-OMEP.

**Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, E/C.12/GBR/Q/7, paragraph 4: ‘(...). In the light of the information on international development cooperation in the report of the State party, please provide information on the findings of the social and human rights assessments conducted in the implementation of programmes and projects in the field of education services abroad and how those findings have contributed to ensuring transparency and accountability for non-State providers of education services, including low-cost private schools. Please provide information on the measures taken to establish an effective monitoring mechanism to regularly assess the impact of low-cost and private education projects on the quality of free public education in receiving countries and to take remedial action, when required.’

Related Articles

Reimagining Africa’s Future: From Financialisation to Foresight

Reimagining Africa’s Future: From Financialisation to Foresight

Macarena Cano Muñoz
Advancing UPR Recommendations on Education and Child Rights in Kenya

Advancing UPR Recommendations on Education and Child Rights in Kenya

Macarena Cano Muñoz
CESCR Review of Kenya 2026: When Evidence Aligns with Accountability

CESCR Review of Kenya 2026: When Evidence Aligns with Accountability

Martín Pintus

SITEMAP

TAKE ACTION

NEWSLETTER

Don´t miss any updates!
SUBSCRIBE
Image

Social Media:

Log in

Climate and Environmental Justice

We have advanced rights-based and gender-transformative transition frameworks through research that centres the lived experiences of women and marginalised communities on the frontlines of extractive energy policies, promoting climate and energy frameworks attentive to the social and care-related impacts of transition pathways. We have developed a clear vision for a gender-just transition, firmly rooted in gender and human rights norms, establishing both the legal basis and the direction for the transformative changes our planet and societies urgently need. In particular, the ‘Guiding Principles for Gender Equality and Human Rights in the Energy Transition’, a collective effort built through online consultations, an in-person workshop and multiple rounds of revision with activists, practitioners and experts from around the world, outline a transformative vision for reshaping global energy systems through a human rights and gender equality lens.

Our work recognises that the climate emergency is both an existential threat and an opportunity to reimagine societies built on social, gender, economic and environmental justice. We ground our advocacy in feminist and intersectional principles, prioritising the agency and perspectives of communities in the Global South who have contributed the least to the climate emergency yet face its most devastating consequences. Central to our approach is the understanding that energy is not merely a commodity but a fundamental human right; essential for dignity, health, education, work and the realisation of countless other rights. We challenge approaches to the energy transition that risk replicating the harmful patterns of fossil fuel extraction and, instead, advocate for transformative policies that ensure human rights and gender equality as central to building climate-resilient societies rooted in dignity, justice and planetary well-being.

What's next?

We will continue to challenge approaches that treat energy transition as merely a technical shift, instead positioning it as an opportunity to reimagine economies and societies rooted in dignity for all, with particular attention to communities in the Global South who have contributed least to the climate emergency yet are most exposed to its worst effects.

We will connect community-level evidence and the lived experiences of those on the frontlines of extractive policies to national reform and global norm-setting, breaking down silos between human rights, gender, and climate movements, and advancing a shared vision that recognises just transitions as not only fundamental to achieving climate-resilient and sustainable societies, but as transformative pathways that advance social and gender equality, redistribute power and resources equitably, and ensure that energy systems serve the public good rather than profit.

We will mainstream rights-based and genderjust transition priorities in key multilateral spaces (particularly, within the Just Transition Work Programme and the to-be-developed Just Transition Mechanism, within the UNFCCC) to guarantee that just transitions are advanced at all levels.

We will also translate our work, through strategic advocacy, into at least two concrete policy wins, whether promoted, adopted, implemented, or scaled, in priority countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Colombia, South Africa, or Kenya), ensuring these policies align with human rights standards, centre gender equality, and reflect the needs and views of affected communities.

We will build momentum for the progressive recognition of the right to sustainable energy to shift dominant narratives away from purely extractive solutions that sideline gendered impacts, community participation, and Global South perspectives.

Economic Justice and Climate Finance

Our work has transformed the global discussion on fiscal policy in a more just, emancipatory and sustainable direction. Our approach has combined both high-level, expert contributions within decisionmaking circles, with bold, impactful work on narrative change with the general public.

We have been instrumental in the inclusion of human rights as a guiding principle of the future United Nations Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation, a multilateral instrument with the potential of raising approx. USD 492 billion per year in public revenues currently foregone to global tax abuse. In the process leading to the ‘Compromiso de Sevilla’ decided at FfD4, we proposed and succeeded in creating a specific human rights workstream within the Civil Society Financing for Development Mechanism, which was critical to ensure that explicit commitments on the matter were included in the negotiating outcome. In a context of cutbacks in multilateral institutions, we have amplified the capacities of technical experts, providing rigorous technical support and leveraging our influence to ensure the enactments of groundbreaking standard-setting instruments, such as the 2025 UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Statement on Fiscal Policy and Human Rights, and the first ex oficio hearing on the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights on Fiscal and Economic Policies to Address Poverty and Structural Inequality, leading to an upcoming thematic resolution on the matter. We have also bridged the silos between multilateral tax discussions and climate finance debates, promoting ambitious financing commitments to increase international and domestic resource mobilisation during COP 28, 29 and 30.

At the regional level, our engagement with fiscal cooperation platforms such as the Platform for Fiscal Cooperation of Latin America and the Caribbean (PTLAC), where we are member of its Civil Society Consultative Council, and the African Anti-IFFs Policy Tracker, for which we participated in the pilot mission in Ivory Coast together with Tax Justice Network Africa (TJNA), have been critical in cementing a growing engagement between tax administrations and ministries of finance with international legal experts, exploring actionable and transformative initiatives, such as the taxation of high-net-worth individuals, beneficial ownership registries and corporate countryby-country reports, to be implemented at the international level.

At the local level, our interventions in fiscal reform debates in Chile, Brazil, Colombia and Nigeria have contributed to shaping legislative outcomes in a more progressive, rights-compliant direction.

As for our leadership in narrative change, we have a measurable track record in delivering tailored, innovative campaigns which have decisively expanded economic justice constituencies by appealing to a broader tent. In Latin America and the Caribbean, we created the ‘Date Cuenta’ campaign, coordinating over 40 organisations across civil society to deliver plain language, innovative messaging connecting progressive fiscal reforms to the financing of health, education and social protection. ‘Date Cuenta’ generated over 55 original campaign messages that were tailored to the realities of seven priority countries (Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru and Honduras) and disseminated in Spanish, Portuguese and English. In doing so, we convened more than 65 online co-creation workshops with partners, coordinating a unified communications strategy which combined digital outreach, press and media coverage, and collaboration with influencers. Ultimately, ‘Date Cuenta’ resulted in more than 60,000 interactions on social media, coverage in major regional and international media outlets, including El País, Deutsche Welle, Bloomberg and France 24, and the participation of at least 63 social media influencers through 58 dedicated publications. In collaboration with Fundación Gabo and the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, we also organised a two-day workshop in Bogota with 20 journalists from 13 countries, building a regional network trained in a human rights-based approach to fiscal policy that has since generated published media coverage on outlets such as La Diaria, Ciper, El Diario Ar and Milenio. Through ‘Date Cuenta’ and our regional advocacy, we strengthened civil society engagement in key processes, including the Financing for Development track and FfD4, co-organised highlevel dialogues with states and civil society from Latin America and Africa.

What's next?

We will shape the UN Tax Convention and its Protocols so they embed human rights principles, and we will stay engaged through follow-up processes (including the expected Conference of the Parties) to support effective implementation. We will keep linking tax and climate finance so that new resources mobilised through fiscal cooperation are channelled to adaptation, mitigation, and loss and damage, in line with UNFCCC commitments.

Public Services for Care Societies

We have translated participatory research into accountability and policy outcomes.

In Ivory Coast, our work with Mouvement Ivoirien des Droits Humains and affected communities since 2023 exposed how privatisation and lack of accountability restrict access to quality healthcare. It contributed to the closure of 1,022 illegal private health centres, an executive instrument strengthening the regulation of private hospitals across the country, and the creation of a permanent complaints management committee in healthcare through a bylaw issued by the prefect of Gagnoa. Partners engaged through this process also advanced concrete improvements at facility level: members of the Gagnoa Midwives Association who took part in the participatory action research pooled resources to renovate the neonatal unit of the Regional Hospital, and the Director of the Gagnoa General Hospital launched an action plan to expand services and improve patient reception, with the facility receiving the award for best hospital in the country in 2025.

In Kenya, our research with the Mathare Education Taskforce documented the absence of public schools and the expansion of private provision, evidencing impacts on households and caregivers and strengthening demands for free, quality public education. This work contributed to stronger community agency and collective organisation, alongside ongoing strategies ranging from communications to litigation to secure a public school in the area, some involving GI-ESCR and others led independently.

Across Africa, this work is complemented by a multi-country study examining the human rights implications of austerity in education and health, including how regressive fiscal policies, rising debt burdens and persistent underinvestment undermine the financing and delivery of public services.

In Latin America, from 29 November to 2 December 2021, over a thousand representatives from over one hundred countries, from grassroots movements, advocacy, human rights, and development organisations, feminist movements, trade unions, and other civil society organisations, met in Santiago, Chile, and virtually, to discuss the critical role of public services for our future. Following the meeting, the Santiago Declaration on Public Services was adopted to demand universal access to quality, gender-transformative and equitable public services as the foundation of a fair and just society.

We are currently advancing work on care systems, linking public services and fiscal justice through integrated research, advocacy and communications, including a regional campaign framing care as a collective responsibility requiring sustained public investment.

What's next?

In Ivory Coast, we will evaluate and strengthen the complaints management committee and position it as a replicable model for other health facilities. In Kenya, we will support the Mathare community to co-design a model public school for Mabatini and Ngei wards, grounded in human rights standards. Building on our multi-country austerity study, we will drive national advocacy on financing for education and health: advancing reforms in Ghana; launching a fiscal policy and public services financing agenda in Kenya through the CESCR process and targeted coalition work; and, in Nigeria, using the new tax acts in force since 1 January 2026 to catalyse a national accountability campaign for adequately funded, quality public services. In Latin America, we will amplify locally led care pilots across 8 countries and turn lessons into influence—advancing care policies that strengthen care organisations, protect care workers’ rights, support unpaid caregivers, include disability and family networks, and redistribute care more equitably.